Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan Meeker-Lowry's avatar

I’ve had a similar experience. Perhaps even with the same person, as the name is the same. But perhaps not. And she also brought up Derrick Jensen. One of the aspects of now that is so divisive, is t himself, and the idea that there are only two sides here. We’re acting like that, but the reality is far different. If we could get rid of the names and labels and talk about actual issues, actual actions being taken, perhaps we would tease out the actual nuances and actually agree on something. Erin, (yours, mine, or ours) is correct about a lot she says. But “her side” doesn’t seem to understand the idea of keeping what’s working and expand on it, while ditching what isn’t, while “our side” seems to have forgotten that big pharma, big ag, the revolving door between all the lettered agencies and corporate CEOs, actually exists and have actually had a very negative impact on the work of the agencies.

It was strange to me to see all the so-called “left” suddenly loving on USAID! And suddenly accepting everything big pharma (the chemical companies in truth) has to say about vaccinations (and other things too but especially vaccinations that have been - and should NOT have been, politicized). I mean really? When I was having my kids, I was aware that vaccinations were a mixed bag of good and not-so-good, and maybe even bad. So I read a lot and took my time getting my boys vaccinated, and those were the days when there were many fewer vaccinations than today. Today? My personal feeling is that the schedule, the lumping so many in one shot, overloading baby immune systems, is potentially criminal. Yes. I said criminal, and I mean that. BUT that does not make me anti-vax. It simply makes me a concerned mother who struggled to figure out what was best for my kids. I think, too, as time passes (assuming we have time to pass), we will tease out the actual truth/reality about the covid vaccinations, and likely we’ll find out it, too, is a mixed bag.

Just like it shocks me to see people who love Earth, who do not support more clear cutting, mining, water extraction for profit, or certainly selling off our national parks and other national lands, simply accept that the EPA, the FDA, the USFS, the USDA, etc. are ALL bad and ALL a waste of money and that it’s a good thing to defund them! Certainly they have not lived up to their purposes, and way too often I’ve asked, “with friends like them, who needs enemies”. Like trying to stop clearcutting of old growth, or prevent mining and clearing in the Arctic (how many times have we fought agains that, won, and then we’re back fighting it again?) Then fighting GMOs. And lab grown “meat”. These are things the so-called left should be up in arms about, but they aren’t. At least not any more.

Mentioning FEMA, NOAA, Social Security, the frayed and soon to be totally destroyed safety net, USPS, all get shrugs. Obviously if they’re being defunded there has to be a good reason, right? Either that or I’ll hear - that’s just fear mongering. They haven’t actually cut anything yet. Totally ignoring the fact that there isn’t any way to give billions of dollars to the billionaires without eviscerating the programs that all of us rely on at some point, to keep us safe, to be there when we retire (that we actually paid into which seems to be forgotten in the discussion), etc. And, as you know, even if someone doesn’t get Medicaid help, their hospitals and other medical offices/services DO depend on it and those doors will be closed. I still wonder what will happen to all the seniors who had to spend down their savings and assets in order to qualify for Medicaid for their nursing homes, that they (and their families) expected would take care of them for life. When I’ve asked that question, they just laugh. Like I’m so crazy to worry they’ll actually put these disabled, sick, dementia struck people in the streets. Well . . . what WILL happen to them? They don’t all have families, and those who do probably don’t have families who can handle their many needs, including 24/7 staff.

In my conversations with my Erin, I know without a doubt there are things we can and do agree on. And the only way we can reach those agreements is to drop the politics, drop the buzz words, drop the personalities, and instead focus on the actual issues, the actual reality on the ground. There are some of the “opposition” who are able to do this. There are plenty who can’t or won’t. But for those that can, if we can engage respectfully about values and vision and what we love, it may make a difference in the next election (the midterms) . . . if we make it that far.

Expand full comment
Sue Kusch's avatar

The real tragedy of the commons is how power brokers have so cleverly inserted division via classification via simple and surface-level thinking via insults and name-calling among the commoners, while the elite strip the land, our culture, our laws, and norms to the barest of threads. The alternate facts, the retelling of history, the baseless arguing, the clickbait media, the embellished distortions, the outright lies, and the othering of everything alive are the propaganda playbook of the powerful. I don't have any Erins in my immediate circle, but I live in a MAGA county, and it is getting scary. The far-right sheriff has gathered a posse and refers to Democrats as "woke, brain-dead liberals." Last week, we stopped by a gun shop and purchased ammunition. Relatives and friends are a bit appalled. But my partner served as a US peacekeeper in the Bosnian War, where neighbors turned on neighbors because they didn't like their beliefs.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts